Tom longboat's daughter

Written evidence of how all have been negatively affected by the BIA-Cayuga Nation tribal court. And the absolute need to have written documentation of these negative experiences and events that were committed by the Cayuga nation tribal court, against the Cayuga people, their children and the non-indigenous people and their children. All Haudenosaunee-Cayuga citizens and the non-indigenous people living around Cayuga Lake need to start writing down how the Bureau of Indian Affairs indian government, the Cayuga tribal court and the BIA Representative have negatively affected their lives. Past and present. If you have not done this yet, you need to do this now. Write down and document as much "first hand" information and negitive experiences that you have had or are currently experiencing. And how it makes you feel. Also collect any and all documentation that you have, including court documents, legal papers, photos, documents handed out by the BIA-Cayuga Nation government, tr...

From Article 3, anytime the U.S. government starts accusing China of genocide, China will simply start talking about the genocide that the U.S. government has done and is still doing to the "indians". It was also related in article 3. that approximately 1970-80's, a Haudenosaunee delegation had a meeting with the Chinese Consulate, where there was a long line of tables with a lot of thick, white binders of documents laying across these tables. The Chinese Consulate related that they understand what the U.S. is doing to the Indians. (this is found in Article 3., title: "This is why Canada is targeting indigenous children with genocide", paragraph 17 and 18.) The date of Article 3. was 2021, well before the U.S. government's "diplomatic boycott" of the 2022 Beijing Olympics.  Things do not change. This document is being presented here to solely disseminate information that China has publicly released in 2022, regarding the United States government...

Website info to follow at end. In the second excerpt, Laura Kellogg, who testified at the 1929 US Congressional Hearings (as mentioned in article 93.) is credited with starting the well-meaning Six Nations Movement, and then, what happened to it. In the third excerpt, it explains how Brothertown asked for US citizenship and individual ownership of land. And this caused many indians to lose their lands to foreclosures because they were unable to pay the property taxes and their land were sold at tax auctions. This is commonly referred to as "checkerboarding". Meaning there are lands that belong to Indians and then lands belong to non-indians, all mixed together. Let's think about the monetary land settlements with extinguishment agreements, currently being pushed upon Indigenous Nations. First excerpt, from "Brothertown timeline" page 49: "1995 the Brothertown Indians Nation Mission Statement (several years ago, I texted this Mission Statement to several of ...

Contact information on "Collaborative Social Change" (CSC) to follow after their definition of international lawyer: "International lawyers are guided by agreements and treaties between countries. They usually practice private or public international law and/or under the auspices of regional legal frameworks. To become an international lawyer, the first step is to complete a law degree and then pass a bar exam to register as an attorney in at least one country. This can be the country in which the person is a national or another country where they are allowed to register. For example, if I'm a Canadian citizen who completed my law degree in the UK, then I can complete the domestic process to register in the UK as a practicing lawyer. So this background is required for any so-called 'international lawyer'. Then, from there, what makes a lawyer "international' is that their work is affected by more than one jurisdiction, which can include international...

These two examples show that justice is waiting for the indigenous people, at the international level. These court cases won at the international level, still have major, far-reaching affects to this day, on the lives of the indigenous people. These two brief summaries prove that indigenous court cases can not be won in the United States or Canadian courts. The first example is when the United Kingdom brought the United States into Peculinary Arbitration at the international level, on behalf of the Cayuga Indians. This was in the 1920's. The United Kingdom was successful on the international level, which started the Cayuga Nation on their journey towards land recognition in the United States. Why didn't the United Kingdom go into the United States courts to do this? Because the United Kingdom knew it did not belong there and neither did the Cayuga Nation. And the U.K. knew it could never be successful in the american courts. And the U. K. understands that as a sovereign nation,...

 The lawyers work on behalf of the U.S. and Canadian governments to get the indigenous nations to sign monetary land claim settlements and extinguish all the treaties of that indigenous nation. It is time to accept that lawyers working for indigenous nations, also work for the U.S. and/or Canadian governments, directly or indirectly. The lawyers have to, they have sworn an oath to protect those foreign, U.S./Canadian governments. There is always a relationship there, that is detrimental to sovereign indigenous nations. It's time to take matters out of the U.S. and Canadian courts and bring them into "international courts". Using "international lawyers". The domestic lawyers working with the indigenous nations now, cannot bring matters to the international courts. Nor do they want to. These domestic lawyers are currently in process of destroying the indigenous people. This is not an exaggeration. Every time a sovereign indigenous nation agrees to a court settleme...

 Onondaga Chief Vincent Johnson called me right after he read article 93. He traveled to Vermont with a Onondaga delegation in the 1970s, to investigate the 2 million acres that the Mohawk's own. (this type of interaction and communication is an example of why these articles are written.) At that time, the information that he gathered, Vermont showed a willingness to give back the land to the Mohawks. With one stipulation, Vermont would give back the land, only if the Mohawks were to all come together and ask for the land back with one voice. The Ononadaga delegation tried, but at that time, this was unable to occur. Some of the history of lands belonging to each indigenous nations is shrouded in murky history, secrecy and division, to say the least. Let us remember that the state of Vermont didn't come into existence until 1791. Before that, New York basically butted up against Massachusetts in a haze. And both were at war with each other during the Revolutionary War. They cal...

Well... the rest of the world is reading it.  It's been about 2 years 9 months since the blogs inception June of 2021. Most download the whole blog. Here is the list of 23 countries with views. U.S.                          2.8K Canada                   2.22K Germany                27 France                    22 Russia                     19 Ireland                   15 Switzerland          14 United Kingdom  11 Sweden                  11 Belgium                   8 Hong Kong              3 South Korea    ...

A reasonable person would think that before a sovereign indigenous nation extinguishes all future land claims, that they would find out first, if there may be land that belongs to them, that they don't know about. This is the reason why extinguishment agreements for all future land claims should never be agreed to or signed. Even in 2024, the history of land claims is still murky. Check out what they were saying in 1929. This is another reason why the U.S./NYS is pushing sovereign indigenous nations to extinguish all future land claims, quickly. While indigenous nations may have forgotten or are not aware of lands they own, the U.S. government and New York State know there are many valid outstanding land claims. The following two excerpts are from exchanges given during testimony in a 1929 U.S. Congressional Hearing. The following is from a government document titled : "The Survey of Conditions of the Indians in the United States. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committe...

 And those legislated, administrative measures are already in place. In the United States, it is the administration of the Bureau of Indian Affairs that is assimilating these "tribal nations". This process has already started. And in Canada, it is the "central administration" of the "Indian Act-elected band councils", also known as the Assembly of First Nations, that is assimilating these "first nations". This process has already started. Both of these "administrations of assimilation", are currently masquerading as "governments" of the indigenous nations. Again, this is why treaties do not belong in the courts. Treaties are to be dealt with nation to nation, at the negotiation table. A major step in the assimilation process is the extinguishments of treaties. Chip by chip, piece by piece, treaties are lost to the court system this way. This has already been done with many indigenous nations across north america, through monet...