Tom longboat's daughter

 This is from a New York Times article titled- "Indian  Affairs Head Reverses Recognition of Oneida Leader". Dated September 26, 1993. New York Times.com The following are excerpts from this article. This is how it was done to the Oneida Indian Nation in 1993, as reported by the New York Times. And this is how it's still done, this time to the Cayuga Indian Nation in 2023. With the Department of the Interior/Bureau of Indian Affairs deciding who is going to be the federally recognized Leader of the Cayuga Nation, and then appointed "BIA Representative". As you can see, nothing has changed. It's the same BIA game plan- different Indian Nation. Start of excerpts from New York Times article: "In a decision that bodes well for the future of New York's only legal gambling casino, the head of Indian Affairs for the Clinton administration has reversed an earlier decision and reappointed Raymond Halbritter as the federally recognized leader of the Oneida In...

The plan to completely control and forcefully assimilate, all of the Native Americans in the United States is simple.  The President of the United States chooses and controls the US Secretary of the Interior/Bureau of Indian Affairs (Secretary of the Interior/BIA). The Secretary of the Interior chooses and controls the BIA Indian Representative (BIA Representive) of the Indian nation. And that BIA Representative chooses and controls all aspects of the lives of Indian people of that Nation.This is accomplished through the NY Federal-State-Tribal Courts and other BIA and casino funded programs administered to the Indian people by the BIA Representative. If any of the Indian people protest or speak up about anything that they feel the U.S. government or the BIA Representative is negatively doing to them or the Indian nation, the BIA Representative can and will retaliate against those indians through the Indian court system- criminal, civil, family court and nation ordinances. Or retal...

 This is when Oneida Indian Nation citizens brought a court case against Bureau of Indian Affairs Representative- Halbritter, for tearing down their houses. The same action Bureau of Indian Affairs Representative- Halftown, did to Cayuga Indian Nation citizens. The following passage includes the court's context for using Alexander Hamilton's quote. This is taken from the website "Tribal Courts in New York: Case Study of the Oneida Indian Nation."  282-page PDF, 25MB's. Information on court case will follow after quote. Here is the context and quote from the court's judgment in this case: "  *93  In holding as we do, we do not unmindfully of the following warning of Alexander Hamilton quoted in United States v. Brown, 381 U.S. 437, 444, 85 S.Ct. 1707, 14 L.Ed.2nd 484: ' if [a] legislature can disenfranchise any number of citizens at pleasure by general descriptions, it may soon confine all the votes to a small number of partisans, and establish an aut...

 The only way to stop this now, is to bring it to the United Nations as Human Rights Violations. Does anyone know how to do this? This is why. Look up the following websites. When you search this first site, the other sites will be part of that search. There is also a YouTube video on the "Second Listening Conference". Here are the websites: "Tribal Courts in New York: Case Study of the Oneida Indian Nation. Tuesday, November 20, 2018." This is a 282 page, PDF, 25MB's. "The Second New York Listening Conference Report 'Working Toward Solutions'. Co-sponsored by: the NY Federal-State-Tribal Courts and Indian Nation Justice Forum, The New York State Judicial Institute and the Western Community Policing Institute." Encyclopedia.com.- "American Indians and the Constitution. A law that satisfies the 'tied rationally' test is not constitutionally defective under the equal protection requirement of the Fifth amendment's due process cla...

 If the current ongoing lawsuit of: Six Nations of the Grand River Band of Indians versus the Governor General of Canada and the Queen, continues to its end, these articles of UNDRIP will be null and void. It will not apply to Six Nations, as the court case will have been decided and supersede Bill C15, thereby doing away with all the "treaties agreements and constructive agreements", and all other legal bindings that Six Nations has with the Crown and Canada.  No matter what the decision of the court is,  the "treaties, agreements and constructive arrangements" that Six Nations has with the Crown and Canada, are gone forever. Article 37-2. Canada will say that it has not violated, diminished or eliminated the rights of Six Nations People under UNDRIP, as Canada has already diminished and eliminated the rights of Six Nation People by the decision of this currently lawsuit: Six Nation of the Grand River Band of Indians versus the Governor General of Canada and the Qu...

 Not known if it had happened before, but on May 10, 2023, a Canadian Federal Court in session, adjudicating a lawsuit, while a Federal Judge was seated and listening to opening statements and arguments; a lawyer, as an "Officer of the Court", did say or utter the acronym UNDRIP, to explain and support his position to the court, citing UNDRIP as why it should be accepted by the court. The Judge also made the utterance of UNDRIP, while speaking on the argument. The judge was clarifying UNDRIP by what the lawyer was presenting to the Court, by referencing UNDRIP as law. Both judge and lawyer clarifying a legal argument, citing UNDRIP, as a point of law. The Federal Judge, without reservation, accepted the lawyers position of using UNDRIP as law, in support of his arguments. At that instance, the court made UNDRIP Federal Canadian Law. UNDRIP means the: United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. It is also known as Bill C15. A federal judge cannot legislate ...

 The Faithkeepers And now we are expressing our gratitude; that this is all we can do. And now this is what the Creator intended, when he finished the creation of the earth. He decided, "I shall have helpers who will be persons among those who move about on the earth. It will be there responsibility to get up the ceremonies, the Four Rituals, the ceremonies I laid down for myself." That is what he intended. And those who are the moiety partners who are called Faithkeepers. It continues unchanged, they are standing there by the pole set up for the Creator. Indeed, they are carrying out their responsibility. When the ceremonies are due, they decide that it is the proper time. And then they get up whatever ceremony it is, announcing that a ceremony is indicated. And indeed, those who are called Faithkeepers have been getting up the ceremonies. It must also be so: the trees are of equal height among the moiety partners who are called Faithkeepers. And there will be consent shown ...

 The Chiefs.  And now we people have gathered. This is what our Creator decided: "they will simply continue to be grateful, those who move about on the earth". And he decided, "they will be responsible for looking after the security of those who move about on the earth. And it will also be there responsibility to roll into one the minds of the people". All that he gave them was good. "They will continue to look after the happiness of the people". That is what he did. And it continues unchanged up to the present. It continues unchanged. They are standing there, the moiety partners who are called Chiefs. They have indeed carried out their responsibility. At all times they look after the happiness of the old people as well as of the children, and those yet unborn. And indeed they also do the talking whenever people gather. They roll into one, as far as they are able, the minds of the people. They keep providing for their happiness. And this is what the Creato...

 This oral tradition history account is given here, with full permission and authorization of Onondaga Haudenosaunee Chief Vincent Johnson. The Paul Delaronde that is being identified here, is the same Paul Delaronde that is the current Court designated and appointed spokesperson for the "Men's Fire" and court designated and appointed source for Haudenossunee Confederacy Great Law and protocol, in the current ongoing lawsuit of: Six Nations of the Grand River Band of Indians versus the Governor General of Canada and the Queen of England. The following oral tradition history is covered under the United Nations Declaration Rights of Indigenous People.(UNDRIP) "Annex- Article 13- 1.: Indigenous people have the right to revitalize, use, develop and transmit to future generations their histories, languages, oral traditions, philosophies, writing systems and literatures, and to designate and retain their own names for communities, places and persons." Here is Ononadag...

 Newspaper article is from The Herald Journal of Syracuse New York. Date of article is July 4th 1990. Page A1, and continues on to page A4. News article written by staff writer M. C. Burns. This newspaper article can be downloaded from numerous newspaper archives. Title of article on page A1, and continuing on to page A4: Warriors words call for execution. And  Onondaga Chiefs should be killed, Warrior says. (Beginning of newspaper article) : Louie Hall lives in an isolated trailer with the battered typewriter he used to pound out his manifesto. Over the last 10 years, that document has inspired a decisive, militant resurgence in the Iroquois Nation and fostered a rebirth of a warriors movement from Canada to Wisconsin. When masked Mohawks with assault rifles block entrances to the St Regis reservation a year ago, Louie Hall was behind them - - not physically, but his words put them there. Those gunman, members of the well-armed Warrior Society at the reservation in New York a...