24.) EASTER is the ancient European-Middle East Goddess of Fertility, Light, Spring & Dawn(10 min read)

 EASTER is thousands of years old and has been through numerous Patriarchal Empires that worshipped Gods and Goddesses. It is not Mythology. For thousands of years, Europeans and people across the Atlantic Ocean, prayed and worshipped to their Gods and Goddesses as they pray to and worship their God today. 

It is not Mythology, it is Religion. If it was only Mythology, as the scholars like to say, and the people did not really believe in these Gods and Goddesses, then who did the Europeans and people across the Atlantic Ocean, pray to, before 2,000 years ago? See how easy this is. It is not mythology, it is religion. So why is it always presented as Mythology?

Easter is a surviving remnant of European Middle East polytheism that is well over 2,000 years old. Through the eons and empires, the name changes slightly-Eostea, Eostra, Ester, but we know this Goddess today as Easter.

Almost two thousand years ago, there is a story about a Disciple going around a Middle Eastern village preaching about his Savior. He happened to be in a village of silversmiths that made their living by selling images and symbols of Easter. When the silversmiths heard that some of the people were listening to this Disciple, the silversmiths got together and tried to kill him. If the people started listening to him, the silversmiths would go out of business . The Disciple escaped and a few of the people he spoke to, started to think about belief in one God.

If you search in old dictionaries and on the internet, Easter will almost always result in being described as a "Christian Festival". You might have better luck if you search the title of this article. Interestingly, there is more truth about Easter on the internet now, then just a few years ago. Could the time of hiding history be getting shorter?

Easter has been depicted in ancient pottery and silversmith work in idol worship images, for thousands of years. Archaeology depicts Easter as a large, naked woman, with fifty breasts, a baby dangling attached, to a finger on each hand and a baby dangling attached, to each earlobe. This is archeology plain and simple. The people and women of Europe worshipped Easter and prayed to her to get pregnant, as they pray to their God and Saints today. 

One version of this ancient Goddess worship, describes Easter as wanting a hare or rabbit for her symbol, because it symbolized fertility to the people. As we know, rabbits multiply quickly. For some reason, there were no rabbits around at that time, only chickens. So Easter, being a Goddess, simply turned a chicken into a rabbit. This is the origin of the Easter Bunny. Since the Easter Bunny used to be a chicken, the Easter Bunny would naturally lay eggs.  But the Easter Bunny was no ordinary bunny. So Yes- the Easter Bunny laided "colored eggs". To the Goddess Easter and the people, eggs represented New Life and Rebirth.

For thousands of years, Easter was celebrated in the spring. The ancient Goddess Festival was celebrated in April, which was then called "Eastermonath", connected to the east where the sun rises. Today, the Easter date changes every year according to celestial/ astronomical events. It is the First Sunday, after the First Full Moon, after the Spring Equinox. That is why it changes from year to year.

I hope it is obvious that these writing are not intended to stop people from celebrating Easter or to stop the children from "coloring eggs". It is presented here to simply have people think and understand what exactly they are doing and why. How many other things do we accept and do in our lives, that we don't think about or know why or understand what it actually means? Like indigenous people disastrously identifying themselves by the colonizing terms of "Aboriginal" or "First Nations of Canada".

Although the internet presents a little more of the truth as time goes on, it still controls the "narrative". Why? As I have said in the beginning, "it is hard to find a truth when they are always trying to hide it". Remember the earlier reference, to be careful of the "question boxes with drop-down answers- with no source on the information"? Since then, it seems like all of these "click on question boxes" with their "drop-down answers" now have Source Information in them. Hmm... 

But who decided the source information that you are seeing? Out of all the source material in the world, who decided you were only going to see this one source to "their" click on question box? And "whose" click on question box is it? And everyone does not get the same search results. Remember your search history and psychological profile? 

All the information you get on the internet needs to be taken with a large, healthy dose of skepticism, even these writings, LOL. Who's controlling the narrative you are following? Is it the Truth or an Alternative Truth? LOL.

A friend of mine recently made the suggestion to change my VPN ( virtual private Network) to a European VPN, like Germany or France for a while. This may give much different searches results. Europeans know more about what the Canadian and U.S. governments are really doing, then the Canadian and American people do.

And now a word on the use of terms- "white people" and "white men" in these articles. Going back to the first Contact between White people and the people of Six Nations, white people have had labels for a Six Nation people, and Six-Nation people have had labels for the white people. So Six-Nation people have always used the terms "white people" or "white men". It is not used in a negitive way, it is used as a statement of fact- We are different from each other. The white people saw this difference also, that's why they had labels for the six-nation people. But their labels for Six Nation people were used in a negitive way to show white supremacy. Even in addressing the Indian people, the whitemen showed their White Supremacy. The white men wanted Six-Nation people to call them- "Father" or the "Great White Father". And the white people wanted to call the Six-Nation men and people- "Son" and "Children". Six-Nation people always corrected them and said we will call each other "Brothers". That is the difference between looking at each other as "equals" or "white supremacy". There is much more to this discussion, but it will be left here for now, for your consideration. 

It has been said that the problem isn't that people are different, the problem is when some people will not accept people who are different. Since the white people came to North America, they have been trying to change the Indian. Kill the Indian save the Child.

Europeans, and people from across the Atlantic Ocean have been polytheistic up until about 2,000 years ago. Since then, they have been trying to move away from polytheism to a monotheistic religion. From the worship of many Gods and Goddess, to the worship of a single God. To my knowledge, Six-Nation People have always understood and believed in one Creator. Perhaps this is why, as was stated in an earlier article: "we see you white brothers fighting over the Creator. We Six-Nation People will never understand how you can fight over the Creator".

 In a Canadian Anthropological Museum Report of 1898, on Six Nations Longhouse cermonies, a white Anthropologist is explaining: 'the missionaries found great difficulty in convincing the Indians that the Christian religion was for them as well as for the white people. Argument to this effect were met by the reply:  "we don't understand this" or "We don't believe it- you are so different from us in every way that it is nonsense to think we should believe as you do". 

White people and Indian people are different. One old timer told me- Indians and white people are like oil and water. To Six Nation people, there is nothing negative about this. We are different and the white people know it.

Mainstream psychology has been saying for some time, that it is a scientific fact- Religion is Genetic. Religion, is only one of many Human Traits that are Genetic. Six-Nation people have been saying this to the white people in different ways, since the white people came to North America. There was a speech from Red Jacket where he uses the birds, as an example to show that there is a natural difference between Indian and White people. It is not a negative thing. It is just nature, it is obvious. 

I have a saying "If human beings are not genetic, then they are the only organism on Earth that are not genetic". Everything is genetic, how can this be disputed? It is science, but there is "Selective Science" also.

A Six Nation person who had a stroke, was asking a stroke doctor, about something that happened to another Six Nation person who had a stroke. This other person spoke fluent Onondaga and English. But after the stroke, the person could speak Onondaga but they could not speak English. The question was put forth to the doctor, why did this happen? The doctor replied- 'oh yeah, we've known this for years, you Indians are different from white people. You speak with one side of your brain and white people speak with the other side of their brain. So when this person had a stroke it must have been on the side of the brain that the English speech comes from. That's why this person was still able to speak Onondaga perfectly. The side of the brain that spoke ononadaga, wasn't damaged from the stroke'.

At this point, it should be noted that science claims the brain is divided into two halves- the analytical side and the creative side. Science claims that white men think with the analytical side of their brain and white women think with the creative side of their brain. It would seem then, that Indian people and white women think with the same side of their brain- the creative side. And white men, think and speak with the oppisite side- the analytical side. This would be science.

There are more physiological difference between white people and Indians also. In dentistry, there is a nerve that runs along each side of the lower jaw, from rear to the front. This nerve is what transmits pain, when dental work is being done to the lower teeth . White people have a single nerve in this area and Indian people have a bifurcated nerve in this lower jaw bone area. If a dentist doesn't know this, they will only use anesthetic on one nerve and the other nerve will still feel pain. A dentist may not know about this bifurcated nerve, unless they have worked on Indian people before. Also, the front teeth of indians are what anthropologists call "shovel teeth". The sides of the front teeth curve inward slightly, the way a flat shovel does. That's where the anthropological term of "shovel teeth" comes from. White people do not have this type of formation, on their front teeth.

And modern DNA has finally, once and forever put to rest the idea that Indians come from Asia. This has always been an absolute falsehood, with no proof or scientific evidence except to say that it is propaganda put forth by the Patriarchal Empires, to justify the theft of North, South and Central America and the genocide of the Indigenous people of the Americas. 

Indian DNA from the Americas, is found nowhere else in the world.

I have seen two documentaries on Educational TV, that state at the time of first contact with the Europeans, there are estimates of between 70 million Indians and 90-100 million Indians, in the Americas at the time of this first contact, 500 years ago. Estimates are that 1/3 of the world's population we're in the Americas at the time of First Contact. These numbers vary, but not enough to discount or hide the fact that this was the "Largest Extermination and Genocide of Human Beings the World has ever seen". Yet, what drop down answer box do you see this in? 

Time to color some eggs. Happy Easter!